<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking Software Pricing in a Service-Oriented World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zapthink.com/2003/11/06/rethinking-software-pricing-in-a-service-oriented-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zapthink.com/2003/11/06/rethinking-software-pricing-in-a-service-oriented-world/</link>
	<description>Sharpening Your Vision of the Future of IT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:54:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.zapthink.com/2003/11/06/rethinking-software-pricing-in-a-service-oriented-world/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://test.zapthink.com/?p=ZAPFLASH-11062003#comment-242</guid>
		<description>&quot;Another approach widely considered by Service providers is charging for Services on a fee-for-use or per-transaction model... In many ways, this is a “pay-as-you-go” approach, and can be quite attractive for infrequently used Services, or for companies that are simply not sure about how they will use certain Services.&quot;

This sort of model is most useful, I think, for small companies. Often, the large licensing fees associated with top of the line enterprise software can pose an artificial barrier to entry for industries requiring their use. A small company can&#039;t afford such software, so it is impossible for them to operate as efficiently as a larger company. Because they&#039;re less efficient, they can&#039;t compete. With per usage, or even subscription based software, this barrier is diminished for small businesses. This is, of course, a great thing for consumers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Another approach widely considered by Service providers is charging for Services on a fee-for-use or per-transaction model&#8230; In many ways, this is a “pay-as-you-go” approach, and can be quite attractive for infrequently used Services, or for companies that are simply not sure about how they will use certain Services.&#8221;</p>
<p>This sort of model is most useful, I think, for small companies. Often, the large licensing fees associated with top of the line enterprise software can pose an artificial barrier to entry for industries requiring their use. A small company can&#8217;t afford such software, so it is impossible for them to operate as efficiently as a larger company. Because they&#8217;re less efficient, they can&#8217;t compete. With per usage, or even subscription based software, this barrier is diminished for small businesses. This is, of course, a great thing for consumers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

